I gave up on it and went to other powder in the event the new powder was establishing a lot more stress and was slower as opposed to previous things. I do not remember if I even tried normal h4831 or not; I am contemplating not.
I've employed H4831 (and H4831SC), and I use it. There are not several cartridges that I utilize it for as I feel generally to gravitate to other powders. On the other hand, I can not declare that it would not do the job. It is simply that Several other powders operate superior for a specified cartridge. For illustration, from the 280, H4831 gave me very good velocity and very great teams with Nosler one hundred forty AB. Nonetheless, RL19 was marginally much better in precision, however the velocity was pretty much equivalent.
The most obvious trigger is a tough/ruff bore. No volume of copper fouling minimizing agents during the powder is going to suitable this.
243, and a few of the loads I have started with encompass, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I'm about to shoot the IMR7828 loads initially, accompanied by the W780 loads just so there won't be any surprises if the H-4831sc loads exhibit a shotgun pattern! Who is aware of, I just may well find a use for it In the end.
The one difference as I know it is that the SC was built to work by way of powder steps much better (which it does). The more time grains never feed very well at all in a few actions. Thats h4831 vs h4831sc my 02 :grin:
Did you ever attempt H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I've a 300wsm now. Taking pictures 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with common chamber. Pondering what to expect with 215 bergers h4831 vs h4831sc with H4331sc?
You might have to make a couple of much more posts to acquire cleared to perform PM's. As soon as you get to that status I'd put up while in the categorized reloading segment to find out if anybody is near you for just a trade.
Anyhow, I needed to give some 7828SC a try to minimize a few of the compression. What a blunder, I could not get this powder to shoot correctly or generate the velocities I get with standard 7828.
WA I would recommend a slower burner that will give better circumstance density like H1000 or IMR 7977, particularly when you're loading heavies long.
Ballistically, this Intense Extruded powder is the exact copy of H4831. Physically, it's a shorter grain dimensions, hence, the designation SC or short Reduce. The shorter, extra compact kernels enable the powder to flow through the powder measures much more easily, helping to relieve the continual reducing of granules.
Kansas Metropolis, MO I might seize what ever is on the market right now. I’ve employed both equally though with my head to load and didn’t see nearly anything distinct effectiveness intelligent.
It really is likely that no even further discussion is necessary, through which case we propose commencing a new thread. If on the other hand you're feeling your reaction is required you could nevertheless accomplish that.
I frequently constantly get the sc Variation. Using a powder evaluate it hangs up significantly h4831sc load data less because of shorter kernels and I think permits extra regular metering so much less time you're taking trickling in the final bit of demand to create pounds. So fundamentally the SC will save you occasions
The reality that the H4831 is in fact a slower burning powder is specifically why you're seeing greater velocities acquired with that powder, in contrast to Anything you've seen Using the IMR stuff.